AI for IT audit and governance
The report identifies the problem. Governance follows the resolution.
Assess controls, gather evidence and move findings into remediation. Myrmex connects auditing to work in the environment, with reviewable changes, verification and recorded risk decisions.
- Criteria
- What needs to be assessed
- Evidence
- What the environment returned
- Decision
- Remediate or treat the risk
- Verification
- What changed after the action
A trail of work that continues after the report.
A completed spreadsheet does not explain what was left out.
A passing control, a finding and an asset that did not respond are different situations. Assessment needs to show its scope and coverage gaps so the owner understands how far the conclusion is supported.
See posture and get to the finding.
Track assessed controls across assets and integrations, locate gaps and inspect the evidence behind the analysis. The summary supports prioritization; the details guide action.
Security posture and environment coverage
Illustrative view of posture, coverage and priorities linked to assessed targets.
Illustrative screens and scenarios. Coverage and actions depend on configured integrations, permissions and policies.
A finding needs a path to resolution.
Select the control, review the plan and authorize remediation. A new check shows the result. For supported hardening, multiple controls and hosts can be organized into one change, with execution and results per device.
Remediate the permission finding
The audit identifies an incorrect file permission on the server.
Fixing an issue and accepting risk are different decisions.
When a fix must wait, preserve the justification and exception validity. When the workflow requires risk acceptance, the letter is sent for signature and its status can be tracked.
Address the condition in the environment.
The plan links the control to targets, impact and authorized execution. Subsequent verification supports closing the remediation.
The next audit starts with what this one leaves on record.
Organize recurring procedures, follow posture trends and preserve decisions and outstanding work. Each cycle helps choose the next action, with context for whoever takes over the review.
Audit and follow-up routines
Scheduled procedures keep reviews within the defined scope and authorizations.
Illustrative screens and scenarios. Coverage and actions depend on configured integrations, permissions and policies.
A view for decision makers. Evidence for reviewers.
Reports and documentation connect technical analysis to leadership discussions. Show findings, completed work and open items without losing the sources behind the conclusion.
Executive decisions should trace back to the technical record.
Service report and evidence
Executive decisions should trace back to the technical record.
Illustrative screens and scenarios. Coverage and actions depend on configured integrations, permissions and policies.
Before putting it into operation
Explore the security controlsDoes a Myrmex audit count as a certification?
No. Myrmex supports technical assessment, evidence organization and remediation. Certifications and formal opinions follow their own processes and responsible parties.
How do control audits differ from vulnerability scanning?
Auditing assesses configuration and controls against available criteria. Scanning identifies vulnerabilities in supported systems. Both help guide prioritization and remediation.
Can we start with assessment without enabling changes?
Yes. The scope can start with queries and assessments in integrations that support reading. Executing changes depends on the corresponding permissions and authorizations.
Bring a finding that keeps returning in every audit.
We will show the path from evidence to decision, remediation and verification in your environment.